Hoe het leven veranderde

Good morning. October.

http://thereformedbroker.com/2014/10/01/remember-2/

The Economist on the third wave and the damaging side of technology

http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21621156-first-two-industrial-revolutions-inflicted-plenty-pain-ultimately-benefited

…and here is a clip by The Economist on the subject

http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2014/10/automation-competing-computers

Tech IPO’s through time. Remember Infineon

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2014/10/biggest-tech-ipos/

Bluff your way into shadow banking…

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2014/10/02/1993072/shadow-banking-defined-again-and-again/

Nice clip on how our office has been moved to our computer

History of the Computer Desk/a>

 

 

Cool tool from the OECD on how life changed over the decades. Financial and non-financial.

http://gitvfd.github.io/How-was-life/

The hump is gone!

http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21621908-what-impressive-work-economic-history-tells-you-about-inequality-breaking

And here is another hump for you…

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/01/the-middle-class-is-poorer-today-than-it-was-in-1989/

Lukas Daalder is in het verleden wel eens als ‘Nederlands best bewaarde geheim’ op het gebied van economie genoemd. Hij publiceert dagelijks een collectie met grafieken, nieuws en informatie over internationale economie en financiële markten. Het aardige is dat je zijn updates in minder dan een minuut gelezen kan hebben, maar dat er tegelijkertijd voldoende stof tot nadenken tussen staat. Lukas is het hoofd van de afdeling Global Allocations en is tevens portfolio manager bij Robeco. Alle meningen in zijn updates zijn op persoonlijke titel.

Disclaimer: All links provided are collected from public websites, unless otherwise specified. I have not checked the data or information for accuracy used, and therefore do not guarantee that all data provided will be 100% correct. The links provided do not necessarily reflect my personal opinion and should be seen as general interest: oftentimes I do not agree with arguments presented, but nevertheless think it is worthwhile to read them. It is up to the reader to make up their own mind. Suggestions or discussions are more than welcome. Do not quote unless specifically cleared beforehand!

Alle edities? Hier.