By Bert Brussen, TPO – According to U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (Republicans, Florida), the whistleblower who recently claimed to a congressional investigative committee that the U.S. government is in possession of “extraterrestrial vehicles and objects” is not the only one. According to Rubio, several individuals holding senior positions in the government have made similar bwering, some long before David Grush went public with his story under the protection of a special whistleblower policy. This reports NewsNation and Newsweek.
Senator Marco Rubio, who serves in the Senate for Florida, is also vice chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence, in which the secrets of the U.S. intelligence and security services are shared by seventeen senators (nine Democrats and eight Republicans).
Rubio to NewsNation:
“Some of the people I’ve talked to about this are well-known people who have talked about this subject many times before, but others are unknown and are telling us this for the first time. Some of them are still working for the government.
“Whether it is true? Some of the claims are beyond anything any of us have ever had to deal with,” he said.
“But we investigate everything without any bias and do not draw premature conclusions in any direction.
“What I can say is that most of the people who made the allegations worked or are still working today in high positions in our government and they had or have access to top secret matters, at high levels. So you can ask the question: what motivation would so many people with those kinds of qualifications have to come up with something like that?”
In early June the website The Debrief published the scoop that David Grush, a multi-award-winning officer who, until just before his confession, worked within U.S. military intelligence, testified to a congressional committee about his knowledge of “secret government projects” involving work with “fully intact and partially intact vehicles that were taken from non-human origin”
Following that American author and journalist Michael Shellenberger also published that several reliable sources from within the U.S. government confirmed this story to him.
Despite the fact that the whistleblowers themselves appear to be reliable, this does not mean that their claims are therefore true. For example, Grush has only testified about what he has heard from others, but has no first-hand evidence. Moreover, it remains only testimony, albeit under oath by reliable persons, and tangible evidence in the form of photographic or video footage or materials is as yet lacking.
So it may be that there is a sophisticated disinformation campaign: the persons making the claims themselves sincerely believe that what they say is true, only that what they have seen or heard is deliberately set up that way to sidetrack them.
For example, because the U.S. government or the Pentagon would rather people talk about things that don’t exist at all than talk about what the government is actually doing, such as testing new weapons systems or aircraft.
However, much of what whistleblowers claim to the appropriate committees is not public and can be shared with the outside world only what is allowed to be shared.
This makes it impossible for journalists and researchers to get a full picture of exactly what is going on and to get confirmation of claims. Only the government, members of the committees and the whistleblowers themselves know all the secret details.
